Since the inclusion of legal professionals in the scope of professionals in the FATF Recommendations in 2003, there has been extensive debate as to whether there is evidence that legal professionals have been involved in ML/TF and whether the application of the Recommendations is consistent with fundamental human rights and the ethical obligations of legal professionals.
The purpose of this typology is to determine the degree to which legal professionals globally are vulnerable for ML/TF risks in light of the specific legal services they provide, and to describe red flag indicators of ML/TF which may be useful to legal professionals, self-regulatory bodies (SRBs), competent authorities and law enforcement agencies.